Thursday, August 7, 2008

HIV still devastating Africans

HIV, the virus which causes AIDS, is still devastating the lives of millions of Africans. Directly, AIDS has killed many. However, indirectly, HIV is responsible for turning children into orphans, for leading to despicable cruelty from witch-doctors' 'prescriptions,' for wiping out a large segment of sub-Saharan Africa's prime labor force. In short, HIV is responsible--along with other factors--for hindering Africa's economic, political, and social development.

Twenty-five years ago, HIV was first identified by Western scientists. Of course, HIV and AIDS had existed in Africa before that discovery. Today, over half of all AIDS cases worldwide are in sub-Saharan Africa. No other region on the planet even approaches sub-Saharan Africa's levels. Of some 33.2 million people worldwide confirmed to have been infected with HIV, 22.5 million of them live in sub-Saharan Africa.

So, the question to ask is why this is?

Many will point out that Africa does not have the resources of wealthier, more developed regions of the world; that HIV is native to sub-Saharan Africa, and thus has had longer to spread; that recent medical discoveries suggest that some Africans could be genetically predisposed to be more susceptible to an HIV infection; etc.

Yet there are more controversial suggestions about why there is such a prevalence of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa, where the virus is primarily sexually transmitted, and these can't be dismissed, either.

Firstly, and the most controversial, promiscuity. Sub-Saharan Africa has the stereotype of being a place where people often have many 'intimate partners,' euphemistically commonly referred to by the phrase, 'official and unofficial polygamy.' Many Africans will point out that the West and Asia also have many promiscuous members. Such is, unfortunately, the case, but even still, the promiscuity is not as widespread as in Africa, nor as socially condoned. Although the concept of what constitutes a 'skank' or 'slut' has been weakened and diluted, those concepts do still exist in Western society.

Then there is the prevalence of 'traditional African medicine.' There are the stupid, but not particularly barbaric ones, such as taking a shower or herbal remedies. But there are also savage ones, such as raping a virgin, or using boys' body parts for 'medicines' (the boys either die or end up mutilated). 'Traditional African medicine' is not on par with 'traditional Eastern medicine,' and even much of that is quackery. While infected Africans are seeking guidance from these 'sagely' stooges, the AIDS epidemic in Africa only increases.

LINKS

If Africa wants to reasonably combat HIV and AIDS, they will have to undergo cultural changes. Whether due to the racism of last few centuries, or other reasons, Africans today seem to unwilling to adopt cultural traits of others, or to acknowledge that some parts of their cultures are not as advanced as other cultures.

There is some myth circulating around that all cultures are equal. All people are equal, not their cultures. To argue that all cultures are equal is equivalent to arguing that all people's work is equal, which is obviously not the case.

Through history, there has been tacit acknowledgment of this fact. Less developed societies would look at their more developed neighbors or trade partners, and would then try to emulate those more sophisticated societies, either in whole or in part. The Germanic tribes of northern Europe recognized that the Roman Empire was more advanced technologically, economically, politically, socially, culturally. And so they emulated Rome, adopting not only Roman technology, but Roman economic systems, Roman law, Roman art, too.

Similarly, the Japanese took note of how China was more advanced than Japan, and therefore emulated Chinese society. As with northern Europe, Japan was not conquered by their more developed neighbor, but they realized what was good for their people, and acted on that. Later, Japan emulated the more advanced West, while retaining parts of their original culture. Today, Japan is the second largest economy in the world (by exchange rate) and indisputably one of the most advanced nations on the planet.

Also, ancient Southeast Asians saw that the Indians who traded with them were more developed than they were, and so they emulated Indian society, and thus made their own societies more developed, too.

Today, the United States looks at East Asia's rapid growth and is analyzing that region for cultural traits to absorb into American culture. In the same vein, China is changing some of its culture to emulate American society.

Northern Europe, Japan, and Southeast Asia acknowledged that their 'original' cultures were not on par with that of their neighbors, and so adopted some of their neighbors' traits and eradicated some of their own cultural traits which were hindering their development.

Sub-Saharan Africa must do the same. Culture must be changed to respect abstinence and look down on promiscuity. Even secular people trying to end the HIV epidemic are starting to promote 'monogamy' (they don't seem ready to just come clean and use 'abstinence'). The old African ways of tolerating 'official and unofficial polygamy' must be abolished.

African culture must also be changed to expose witch-doctors for the frauds they are. Raping a child or taking a shower will not cure AIDS. 'Traditional African medicine' needs to be tossed out. Western medical practice needs to be brought in. To all segments of African society, even the poor and rural. Africans need to stop respecting the witch-doctors; and some of them should be prosecuted and punished for prescribing murder, rape, and mutilation.

Africa needs to acknowledge that parts of its cultures are not as advanced or good as other cultures, and that Africa needs to adopt cultural traits and values from other, foreign cultures, while pruning out part of their original cultures.

Then Africa can finally take charge of the fight against AIDS and HIV. Then Africa can finally start to economically, socially, and politically develop at a faster pace.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Sarkozy's Mediterranean Union: Unifying the Divided.

Yesterday, French President Nicholas Sarkozy launched the Mediterranean Union, an alliance encompassing the EU and countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea, in Paris. The idea of a Mediterranean Union has been something of a pet project for Mr. Sarkozy, and many analysts expecting this launch--and indeed the union--to be little more than a bit of political flash and glitter.

France and Egypt will be the first co-chairs of the Mediterranean Union (Source: Website of the French Presidency of the Council of the European Union 2008).

While the ultimate fate of the Mediterranean Union may indeed disappoint, the inauguration of the union far surpassed the cynical expectations. For starters, even before the official launch of the Mediterranean Union, French helped procure an agreement for Lebanon and Syria to set up full fledged embassies in each other's country, something which has not happened since both Syria and Lebanon gained independence from European rule. Then there was the seeming rapprochement between Israel's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the West Bank's President Mahmoud Abbas.

However, it does seem somewhat unfair, and even divisive, that while all members of the European Union are now members of the Mediterranean Union, even those European states which do not even border the Mediterranean Sea, that not all members of the African Union are made member states of the Mediterranean Union. Undoubtedly, sub-Saharan Africans' North African neighbors did not push all that hard--or at all--for every African Union state to be granted admittance to the union. The one North Africa leader who might have made such an effort, Libya's Muammar Gaddafi, did not attend, viewing the union as an attempt at colonialism.

For the Arabs, having a union with Europeans being initiated by the French in Paris is fitting, as the word for Europe in Arabic is derived from the word for 'France.' For Israel and Turkey, both those countries have strong ties to the Gallic country.

The union will comprise 43 states, consisting of the EU, North Africa, and Levant; additionally, the union will be headed by a "North-South co-presidency."

Meanwhile, the website for the French Presidency of the European Union 2008 states as the basis of the Mediterranean Union:
"a political mobilisation at the highest level through Summits of Heads of State and Government every two years; a governance on an equal footing, in the form of a North-South co-presidency and a permanent secretariat with equal representation; a prioritising of concrete projects with a regional dimension that create de facto solidarity."
These principles are largely for the purpose of realizing two goals, reducing illegal immigration from North Africa, and reducing regional hostilities.
LINKS
All quotes and pictures in this article are from the Website of the French Presidency of the Council of the European Union 2008.

This last goal will be particularly difficult. Already mentioned, are rivals Israel and Syria, along with the Palestinians and Lebanon. Then there are Greece and Turkey, Morocco and Algeria, and even Spain and Morocco and Turkey and Cyprus. Many of these were brought up by President Sarkozy himself. He hopes that the Mediterranean Union will bring peace and prosperity to the Mediterranean region the same way that the European Union brought peace and prosperity to Europe.

This is a noble objective, but a difficult one to achieve. As stated, many of the countries have political rivalries. There is also the issue of religious values between Christians, Atheists, Muslims, and Jews. Add onto that that there is a huge gap in the levels of economic development between members, far more than between members in the European Union. And there is also system of government; while many are officially democracies, many would be more appropriately considered autocracies. Sarkozy, France, and the member states have a lot of work cut out for them if they are going to make the Mediterranean Union a success.

If the Mediterranean Union works, then that will be great for the world, showing that a region with diversity in 'race,' religion, politics, ideologies, and values can work together equitably and peacefully for the good of all in that region. In essence, unifying those which were divided.

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:

The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Dear Africa: Oust Mugabe.

Recent news has reported that Zimbabwe's leader of the opposition MDC intended to end his run for the Zimbabwean Presidency. Mr. Tsvangirai made his decision in the wake of despicable acts of violence against many of his supporters. In fairness, Tsvangirai did not stand much of a chance of winning this run-off election--though he handily won the first round--because of the intimidatory tactics of the ruling Zanu-PF. MDC supporters, and even just sympathizers, have been murdered and brutalized by military and militia forces. This includes supposed 'war veterans,' many of whom are too young to have fought in Zimbabwe's struggle against 'white' rule.

As Tsvangirai succintly puts it himself, this is a "violent, illegitimate sham of an election process." There will not be legitimacy when Mugabe wins; and Mugabe is practically assured victory. If Tsvangirai no longer runs, then there is no longer the need for a poll, and Mugabe will be declared the winner.

This sham masquerading as an election is a shame for all of Africa, particularly sub-Saharan Africa. Mugabe has run Zimbabwe into the ground, turning a robustly developing country into a basket case with the world's highest inflation. Even more unfortunately, this reflects badly on all of Africa, and is used as ammunition by 'white' racists, who point out--accurately--that under 'white' ruled Rhodesia, even 'black' Rhodesians had a much higher standard of living than under 'black' ruled Zimbabwe. Mugabe has given these racists yet another stone to lob at 'blacks,' and they (the 'white' racists) are more than willing to oblige.

The strongest hope for Mugabe's ouster comes neither from within Zimbabwe nor from the developed world. The former cannot fight and win against the Zimbabwean military, which still seems to support Mugabe (unsurprising as many of Mugabe's soldiers are as corrupt as he is). The latter is unwilling to use more than words and economic sanctions at this point. The hope is that the governments of Zimbabwe's neighbors will take action, realizing how Mugabe's inept rule has adversely affected investment in their countries, either directly--such as making foreign investors view the region as undesirable--or indirectly--such as making those neighbors have to deal with huge influxes of Zimbabwean refugees although many of them already have difficulty providing food and jobs for their own people.

Countries such as Zambia have taken the strong stand in opposition to Mugabe. Others, notably the regional leader South Africa, have basically just stood by as Mugabe cheats his way into a new term. A few support Mugabe, mainly countries ruled by men who--similar to Mugabe--fought for their countries' independence from 'white' rule, either abroad or indigenous.

And, at first glance paradoxically, it is this last group that could be key to knocking Mugabe from the Presidency. A major factor in his refusal to cede his position to Tsvangirai is that he--along with his top cronies--believes that he will face justice should he lose power.

And he should face justice.

However, for the sake of pragmatism, Mugabe and his posse should be permitted to keep at least a portion of the assets they stole from the Zimbabwean people, and should be given a promise that the new government will not seek to prosecute them. They will further be granted the right to expatriate themselves to another country. Angola would be ideal, as the government there is largely supportive of Mugabe, and the culture and climate are roughly similar to that of Zimbabwe, as are the people.

If the Mugabe government is granted these promises, then they just might end their incompetent and corrupt reign. And then a rebirth, a renaissance, of Zimbabwe--named after that great sub-Saharan African kingdom of old--can begin anew.

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:

The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Safaricom: A Floating Hope for Africa.

Yesterday, one of east Africa's most successful companies, telecommunications firm Safaricom, was floated on Kenya's Nairobi Stock Exchange, the stock market's largest flotation to date.

Safaricom, previously a joint venture of the Kenyan government and the British company Vodafone, had a profit of some $370 million in 2007, and is the largest cellphone service provider in Kenya. Across Africa, the cellphone industry and telecommunications are booming, in part due to lack of phone lines and the difficulty of putting in infrastructure in the continent because of war and terrain. Safaricom's willingness to sell service by the second was also a wise decision in impoverished Africa.

At the IPO, an initial twenty-five percent stake in the company was on offer, distributed among ten billion shares for sale. After a day's trading, shares grew by 60% over their original price, and Safaricom shares now comprise a huge 40% of the Kenyan stock market.

This was a big story for Kenya, and Africa. The Kenyan President was at the IPO to signal the start of trading. Already, the government has made some $818 million from the sale. As shares will be cheaper for Kenyans to buy than for foreigners, many poor Kenyans have become first-time shareholders, and now have a stake in Safaricom's, and Kenya's, economic success. And the IPO has put Kenya in the news for more respectable reasons than violence and corruption. Kenya--and Africa--could use some PR for a change.

Africans themselves seem hopeful about the IPO and what the offering entails for Kenya and Africa.

Finally, foreign interest--and foreign direct investment--in Africa is beginning grow more, and in fields other than non-renewable commodities such as metals and gems and other minerals. Safaricom is in the services sector, and relies on human capital, which Africa has in abundance. Investors are starting to see Africa as a more attractive, and less risky, place in which to invest their money. Across Africa, GDP is growing by around 6% per annum, although much of this is still due to high commodities prices, such as for Nigerian oil.

Yet still, Safaricom's impressive first day on the stock market could be one of the first signs that Africa's development is about to kick off and into high gear.

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
The Roadmap to the Future.
The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:

The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Yet Another Setback for Africa

A country in turmoil. Riots and violence in the streets of what was once one of Africa's most promising states. Citizens with an average lifespan less than what it was before. People the world over have heard or read of the fall of Zimbabwe. And this piece shows that Zimbabwe's hardships are set to continue for a while more.

However, the above was not about Zimbabwe, but rather that country's southern, and--until recently--far more respectable neighbor, South Africa.






South Africans themselves are primarily to blame.




Partly due to Zimbabwe's collapse, and partly due to South Africa's relative success, the 'Rainbow Nation' has become something of a magnet for Southern Africa's economic migrants. What is very much a struggling, developing country, handicapped by AIDS and still dealing with the aftereffects of apartheid, is now further burdened by having up to roughly a tenth of its population being (largely impoverished) foreigners seeking jobs in Africa's regional power. Now these foreigners are being blamed for South Africa's less-than-stellar economy and overall development.

Maybe there is some validity to that argument; maybe not. But one thing is for sure: the violence toward these newcomers from Zimbabwe and other Southern African countries is not acceptable. Already, over twenty foreigners have been murdered--one being burnt to death--and thousands of migrants are preparing to repatriate to their countries of origin, even if they have lived legally in South Africa for over a decade.

In the case of the Zimbabweans, who comprise a large portion of these aliens, they've traded violence and persecution at home for violence and persecution in South Africa, a place in which they sought refuge. Now these refugees are preparing to travel to Zimbabwe even as that country is set for more violence. If these immigrants were to vote in the run-off, they would be subjected to intimidation, as they would throw the electorate off-balance, and bolster those who seek to finally oust Mugabe.

Furthermore, even if the migrants have held down South Africa's rise a bit, the fact is that the bulk of the blame falls squarely on South Africans themselves. They're responsible for their mediocre economic growth. They're responsible to the epidemic of AIDS that is wracking the country. And they're the people who voted Mbeki into power. The same Mbeki who has, as of yet, done far too little to pressure Mugabe to step down from power so that Zimbabwe can thrive once again.

While it's easy to blame the outsiders, South Africans need look no further than their own nation to see who's at fault for their country's developmental lethargy.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.

Words to live (forever) by: John 3:16.

wall. wall. wall. wall.

John 3:16 (King James Version)

"16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."



wall. wall. wall. wall. wall.

Biblegateway.com.

Tag this post with:
Delicious Logo Delicious Digg Logo Digg Technorati Logo Technorati reddit Logo reddit Facebook Logo Facebook Stumble Upon Toolbar StumbleUpon Furl Logo Furl Digg Logo blinklist

--------
Found this article interesting? Check out:
History: The Roadmap to the Future.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Africa.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Asia.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Europe.
History: The Roadmap to the Future--Latin America.

Or:
The Science Fiction Channel + Technorium.
The Vegetarian Diaries + Biologeel.